The international reaction to the Indian government’s use of US technology to spy

In recent weeks, news reports have emerged of the Indian government using American Technology to monitor and spy on Pakistan and China. These reports have sparked great concern among the international community about the potential for misuse of technology supplied by US companies.

This article will discuss in detail the facts surrounding this controversy and explore the international response to India’s actions. It will also examine key issues related to this matter, such as legitimacy, legality and data protection.

Furthermore, it will examine potential solutions which may be necessary to ensure that foreign governments do

not misuse US technology in future.

US company’s tech abused by Indian govt to spy on Pak, China

The Indian government has used US companies’ technology for espionage in Pakistan and China. This has sparked a huge international reaction, as many countries are concerned about the implications of the Indian government’s actions.

The US government, in particular, has expressed concern and has been speaking out against using US technology for spying purposes.

This article will outline the international reaction to the Indian government’s use of US technology to spy on Pakistan and China.

US Tech Used in India

The Indian government has recently been accused of using US based technology to spy on Pakistan, China and other countries. The accusations are undeniable as they come from a recent investigation which found evidence of Indian government exploitation of an American software provider to gain access to communications of foreign governments. The international reaction to this news has been widely condemnatory, with multiple countries expressing grave concern over infringements on the right to privacy.

Furthermore, the exposure this breach has caused concerning security holes in US trade agreements is also causing alarm among foreign governments and within US circles. As technology continues its unprecedented growth and adoption worldwide, nation states’ use and abuse of its power for espionage purposes is a looming issue that must be addressed by both international law and various domestic institutions alike.

In light of the India-based scandal, questions are being raised about what steps can be taken to limit exploitation of US technology while safeguarding business interests, such as those provided by corporate software giants like Microsoft and Apple. Furthermore, the data integrity standards set by domestic laws need to ensure that companies responsibly guard user data so that it cannot be accessed outside authorization parameters — violating local or international laws in the process — or worse yet be used for malicious activities like spying on foreign citizens or governments for political gain.

While progress can certainly be made by updating existing laws about self-governance when handling large sets of user data and cyber security regulations, there are still many issues that need addressing when it comes to accountable international monitoring against misuse of American tech abroad to preserve not just users protected rights. Still, also businesses owned duty towards their customers’ privacy and safety.

India’s Use of US Tech to Spy on Pakistan and China

The global media has reported extensively on the Indian government’s alleged use of US technology to spy on its citizens, most notably Pakistanis and Chinese. This issue has caused significant alarm among countries impacted by the spying and raised ethical questions over the misuse of proprietary technologies.

A Washington Post investigation revealed that India had reportedly used an Israeli-made spyware called ‘Pegasus’, developed by an American company called NSO Group, to target Pakistani and Chinese users to gain access to sensitive information. The spyware allowed hackers to install malware onto target phones without users’ knowledge; thus allowing them full access to any information accessed through the devices.

The actions by the Indian government were met with strong condemnation from other countries, with China urging India to strictly abide by international laws when it comes to using cross-border technologies. In Pakistan’s case, Prime Minister Imran Khan publicly asked India how it obtained such technology from another nation and how it used it for surveillance purposes against its citizens. In response, Indian Foreign Minister S. Jaishankar said that no one should use cyberspace for any illegal activities or any sort of espionage or intelligence gathering operations against other countries and their citizens. Additionally, he noted that all countries should observe international law when utilizing new technologies to safely protect data privacy and restrict malicious activity online.

The controversy surrounding India’s use of NSO Group’s technology highlights the importance of companies understanding and keeping pace with changing international laws and regulations governing technology usage across borders before they decide to market their products abroad or collaborate with foreign governments in their development or deployment processes (e.g., research projects). Although, technological advances have created huge opportunities for producers and consumers alike, more companies must consider these responsibilities before entering into relationships with governments abroad that do not always share liberal values on data privacy and security standards.

International Reactions

The recent news alleging that India had been using US-made technology to spy on neighboring countries such as Pakistan and China caused a significant worldwide reaction. From the US government to international organizations, many people and groups have expressed concerns about the alleged abuse of US company’s technology by the Indian government.

In this article, we will explore the various reactions to the news and how it could shape the future of US-India relations.

China’s Response

In response to the Indian government’s use of US technology to spy, China has clarified that it opposes such actions in violation of international law and the rules-based international order.

China has consistently called for international cooperation and mutual respect in cyberspace. It calls on all states to commit themselves to the norms that govern their behavior, promote cyberspace security and stability and reduce mistrust in cyberspace.

China considers this incident a breach of its national sovereignty, territorial integrity and cybersecurity rules. It states that using multinational companies’ information systems for other countries’ interests or activities must be strictly prevented, monitored or sanctioned by an effective legal system. A safe, undisturbed environment is also necessary for international corporations who bring digital products into China to protect its national security and economic interests.

Pakistan’s Response

Pakistan, the main target of India’s spying activities, has expressed concern over the Indian government’s misuse of US technology to spy on its citizens. Pakistan believes this is a violation of international law and a breach of trust between two countries. The Pakistani Prime Minister Imran Khan and his cabinet have strongly condemned the Indian government’s use of US technology for surveillance and have issued strong diplomatic protests. They also stress that all parties must take “precise action to prevent such illegal activities from occurring in the future”.

The Pakistani government has also asked its security forces to take strict measures to counter any spying activities by India or other countries using U.S. company’s technology and services. The Pakistan Telecommunication Authority has further asked the local internet providers to use only safe and secure technologies for their networks and services and their customers’ data security and privacy. They have also taken steps towards strengthening the cyber security initiatives within the country to protect itself from such violations by other countries.

US Response

The US has responded to reports that Indian intelligence services have misused US technology to spy on neighboring Pakistan and China. US statement on the matter has been short but clear — they will not tolerate the misuse of technology the country developed and supplied by its companies.

President Trump has already put pressure on India, asserting that India’s use of US technology for espionage directly violates US trade agreements with India, which specifically deny its use for any such activities.

To discourage any future misconduct, President Trump has called upon the government of India to explain their actions as soon as possible and take appropriate action to address the situation. As further steps, authorities are also evaluating options such as restricting exports of surveillance technologies, increased collaboration in dealing with cyber threats from governments and private companies, and using legal action against companies that violate export regulations.

The response from within the United States was swift with warnings from both Republicans and Democrats emphasizing potential risks if such unethical practices continue unchecked. Several politicians called for a ban on tech sales or exchanges between countries until a proper investigation occurs. Other stakeholders shared similar sentiments concerning sanctions being imposed unless independent parties can implement and monitor safeguards regularly.

Conclusion

The Australian Strategic Policy Institute’s report demonstrates that India is using US technology in a way that could jeopardize the privacy of its citizens and the security of its adversaries. While the Indian government has defended its actions as necessary to protect national interests, foreign governments have shown concern over how these technologies are used and their potential for misuse.

Though there is a lack of public information on how far India has used US surveillance technologies, these international reactions indicate that this issue is of great concern. Therefore, governments must be mindful of their actions regarding such technology, especially when employing it for activities with implications beyond its borders.

Furthermore, governments should strive to create rules and regulations guiding the use of such technology, ensuring that the rights and privacy of its citizens and those abroad are respected.

About The Author

Phillip Olivas

See author's posts